By Juan Carlos Sanabria
April 16, 2013
When I first
started the blog, I was asked to talk about public history. At first,
I didn't have the slightest clue about public history. I knew it was
not like being a traditional history practitioner, specifically a
professor conducting research at a university and publishing work in
academic journals and books. As I carried out research on the topic,
I found some interesting things about public history that placed the
+Florida Historical Society 's public history practices within proper
context.
All history
practitioners active within the field of historical study engage in
some form of public history work. It is from the public, with their
boxes of old photos and letters, their artifacts and stories, that
supply historians with the fuel for further research. The public is
presumed to be as much a part of the history's course – perhaps
even more so – than those which observe and interpret its
procession from an objective standpoint. But at some point, the field
of historical study, as led by historians seeking academic
appointment, was cut loose from its public roots ingrained within the
historical societies, museums, archives, and government offices. This
is the case, as told by the “What is Public History?” page of the
National Council on Public History. The page's unmentioned author
wrote that it was a job crisis for Ph. D.'s during the 1960s and
1970s that made many traditional historians realize their distance
from those roots.
Pressed financially
and philosophically, some of these professionals shifted their
intents from academic appointment in a university to working with
historical societies, museums, and the other various institutions
that hold closer ties to the public than the ivory towers of your
typical university. These towers may maim a historian by distancing
them from the way the public thinks about and consumes historical
study. Within those towers, a historian's main concern is his or her
peers, historians which can contribute to the perfection of his or
her highly specialized research. In turn, that historian hopes to
contribute to his or her peers' work.
Public history
became the movement that it is today because of the schism between
traditional, academically-inclined historians and those who may not
prefer that career path equally. Consequently, public historians
gradually emerged from the field's professional downturn as
historians with greater interdisciplinary experience because of the
shifting audiences that consume public history work. In contrast,
traditional historians' audience is their peers in academia or other
professionals focusing on that particular subject. Though public
history requires the same level of reputable scholarship, its
audience is presumably less historically educated, and thus public
historians must find innovative ways of communicating history and
getting support for further research. And since public history work
became more than just the publication of scholarly papers and books,
practitioners may take up techniques from film and radio producers,
curators, local historians, genealogists, the tourism industry, and
community activists. By doing so, public historians make history
interesting and/or useful, thus making history profitable not only
for those involved, but for the local community. It's public
historians, in particular, that hope to build a cultural and
financial symbiosis with the surrounding community so that the local
history can be a resource for further public history work and a
cultural resource for the locals and tourists to marvel at.
It's no secret:
studying history has been a more successful discipline than it has
been a fruitful profession. It made sense for dedicated practitioners
to focus on academia or law, considering how well those careers pay.
That pay may not distract from the deep commitment to a truthful
study of history (the main thing uniting public and traditional
historians), but it will likely separate historians from the general
public. Public history removes those barriers, at least, as far as I
can tell volunteering at the +Florida Historical Society . Several
times a week, long-time locals of Brevard County stop by to ask about
information regarding family members, to donate photos or original
material (objects or writings from a particular time period), or to
convey oral histories about the community back in the day. It's
obvious the Historical Society understands what it means to conduct
history outside the classroom and conferences. My only hope is that
some of those professors in the ivory towers come down to join the
larger discussion with the public.
As always, thanks
for reading and have yourself a great day.
Best regards,
JCS
No comments:
Post a Comment